My topic for our upcoming writing prompt is that of how the
media portrays patriotism and how the U.S. government uses these
representations to gather support from citizens or from other countries. In
researching a source for this topic, I made an attempt to look through the TAMU
library website to locate a journal from Jstor. What I have found is a
scholarly journal titled What Does it
Mean to Be an American? Patriotism, Nationalism, and American Identity After
9/11. This article comes from the Political Pschology Journal Vol. 25 and
was written by Qion Li and Marilynn Brewer from Ohio State University. Before I
even read the article, we can safely assume this is a credible scholarly
article due to where I found it, (its location on Jstor); it’s documentation of
who wrote it, and where they gathered their information.
The article itself discusses the psychological impacts of buzzwords
such as nationalism and patriotism in the media and how they affect the masses.
The article describes this by stating, “The
differentiation between the positive and negative manifestations of national
identification is represented in social psychology by drawing a distinction
between ‘patriotism’ and ‘nationalism’ with the former connoting pride and love
or the country and the latter referring to chauvinistic arrogance and desire
for dominance in international relations.” This is a very important point that
the article is making to describe the disparity between the two. The article
continues to go into pre-9/11 history and how this was consistent throughout
history with Presidents such as President John F. Kennedy’s quote, “Ask not
what your country can do for your, but what you can do for your country.” This
rhetoric itself, which the article concludes, is the reason that we see a sense
of “with us” or “against us” mentality in the political spectrum. Do you believe that this discourse is correct? Incorrect? Tell me what you think!
No comments:
Post a Comment