Friday, April 5, 2013

Cultural and Social Acceptance


            The other night, I was sitting on my couch watching national news when a headline about Texas A&M University came up. This headline described some of the buzz I have been hearing on campus about a bill that was passed by Texas A&M’s student senate this week. The bill which is known as the “Religious Funding Exception Bill” gives students which was originally drafted to allow university students to opt-out of the university fee that funds the GLBT resource center. This has caused a huge outcry from students and many human rights groups across the nation.
            Regardless of who you are, how you feel about particular group, or what religious group you conform to this bill raises a few questions not only about the idea of cultural norms on campus, but sensitivity to minority organizations on campus. 
Firstly, the fact that these senators would single out a specific group based on “religious beliefs” can be very detrimental to the university.  This principle in itself can be used in any regard. If a person claims their religion does not support people of color then would the university allow them to cut funding for African American groups on campus?
Secondly, this issue continues to brand the university as a university deeply rooted in discrimination and bigotry. As one of the few minority aggies on campus, it makes me feel as if we aren’t progressing forward.
Although these are true, a large portion of the student body expressed their concerns with this via social media and wrote to the Student Government President Claybrook to veto this bill. Today, President Claybrook sent out a press release stating that he vetoed the bill and hopes that the senate limits this type of controversial legislation in the future. Through these issues comes optimism for the future. Do you believe that this was the right decision by the president? Do you agree with congress voting this bill in? Tell me what you think! 

2 comments:

  1. I completely agree with what John Claybrook did as President. I personally feel that this bill was an embarrassment to the Student Senate, SGA in general, and Texas A&M. In this modern age when social acceptability is praised and preached, we as Aggies should be moving towards a more inclusive environment no matter what kind of "religious beliefs" you possess. It is completely wrong to single out a particular group of individuals for holding a differing view, but at the same time I can understand the fact of some students not wanting to pay for a service that they will never gain a benefit from. Overall though, it should not be left up to the Student Senate to decide this matter and I agree with what President John Claybrook did regarding the bill.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agree with President Claybrook’s choice to veto the “Religious Funding Exception Bill” because I don’t believe that groups such as GLBT are hurting anyone by having sexual preferences that differ from the “norm”. This situation does make A&M look bad, but I think everything will blow over because Claybrook set things straight, and I don’t think our university has been very intolerant in recent years.

    ReplyDelete