Anyone who has ever had to construct a logical argument
knows how important rhetoric and diction are to the effectiveness of the point
they are trying to get across. Whether it be through word choice, using
rhetorical devices such as metaphors, similes, allegories, and personification
to prove a point or using an antithesis, oxymoron, and paradoxes to disprove a
point the result remains the same: One must use appropriate language and
analysis to construct an argument.
In
Susan Welch’s blog In Diversity, India Seeks to Rise Above Caste, Color she starts her
blog stating of with giving statistical analysis of India’s ethnic background. She uses empirical facts to appeal to her
readers’ logos. Welch states, “India
represents a large swath of people. Roughly three-quarters of its roughly 1.17
billion people are Indo-Aryan, and Dravidians make up another large chunk. But
the remaining 3% is divided among 2,000 ethnic groups. Hindi and English are
two of the 18 recognized Indian languages.” to describe how diverse the country
is and how it is breaking traditional social barriers such as the cast system
which has plagued India for so long. She does this throughout her entire blog
to show that there is an increase in women in education, but also an increase
in discrimination against darker skin colors due to the increase in skin
whitening products, and a decrease in age discrimination due to a rise in
people under the age of 25 in the country.
These tactics Susan Welch uses are a great way for her to convince people
she is right, since facts are empirical.
In What Are We Searching for? By a blogger
who only uses the name Katrina, uses allegorical examples by appealing to ones
pathos. Describing how social medias attempt to appeal to people’s emotions by
stating “All those postings on Facebook, Twitter, or whatever internet site
your hanging out on, will not fill the void. (Before anyone stops reading, I
have accounts on Facebook and Twitter), I’m just saying they’re not a
substitute for the deeper longings. More time on the internet is not going to
stop the yearning, it’s a band-aid, not a cure.” She uses many examples of
diction, and logical paradoxes to sway her reader.
Both
writers attempt to use their own form of rhetorical devices to sway their
readers through pathos and logos.
Great analysis for both articles! I like your use of examples and quotes to show how each author is directing their rhetoric. Overall good analysis!
ReplyDelete